This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

Verizon truck

Dorsum in 2015, Verizon was sued by the Communications Workers of America for its general failure to maintain copper infrastructure in Pennsylvania. We covered the result in October of terminal twelvemonth, when CWA officials testified that Verizon was willing to burn employees for maintaining copper infrastructure, while simultaneously failing to deploy replacement wireline service over fiber. Employees were instructed to migrate customers to Verizon'south VoiceLink wireless service if any opportunity to do then existed, fifty-fifty if that service was an imperfect or unsuitable replacement for the copper service they previously had.

At present, Verizon has signed an understanding with the CWA requiring it to repair and supercede bad cables, defective equipment, and faulty dorsum-up batteries, while simultaneously dismantling at least xv,000 double telephone poles. The settlement between the CWA and Verizon is the consequence of a complaint brought before the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission. The settlement represents a meaning win for Verizon's hapless customers, who have been subject to considerable service issues as a issue of the company'southward behavior.

What's a double pole?

The utility poles that often carry electricity and telephony have a limited shelf-life and must be periodically replaced. 1 major component of the CWA's complaint against Verizon was that the company had allowed its copper infrastructure to degrade to absurd levels, and double poles were very much a component of that deliberate degradation. To eternalize its case, the CWA showed up with a number of photos illustrating the trouble — nosotros've combined some of them to create the collage, pictured below (click to enlarge).

In some cases, Verizon has left literal pieces of pole hanging in mid-air to avoid the expense of placing a new utility pole. Verizon reported a net income of $13.61 billion in 2016 and trumpeted its improved wireline margins during this same year, relative to 2015. Verizon, in other words, isn't exactly hurting for cash, and its wireline business isn't some huge drain on the company's avails, either.

"For almost two years, CWA documented Verizon's failure to repair the copper network and equipment, in areas where Verizon has chosen non to build out its FiOS fiber network," said CWA District two-13 Vice President Ed Mooney. "We submitted those findings, along with substantial and expert testimony about the result, spotlighting the threat to service quality and public rubber. This settlement is a large victory for Pennsylvania consumers, who pay for and await their telephone service to work."

Hither's what Verizon has agreed to:

  • It must evaluate all cable replacement requests fabricated in 2015 and 2016 that identified faulty cable across the state, review these requests, prioritize them according to objective criteria, and share that information with CWA. All replacements must exist completed within 18 months.
  • Information technology must remediate the 30 (by and large rural) copper locations with the worst service performance and customer trouble reports. It must classify additional resources to maintenance in these areas and complete all repairs to the worst 15 areas within eighteen months, with 36 months allotted for repairing the remaining 15 areas.
  • It must remediate (read: supervene upon) xv,000 double pole configurations as per above at a rate of five,000 per year, to be completed within 36 months.
  • Information technology must adequately examination and supersede batteries in remote terminals. Prior to this agreement, Verizon has systemically neglected this testing. This is no small-scale outcome; the fiber Verizon has deployed in areas where it tore out its copper infrastructure depends on bombardment backups when the power fails.
  • It must report its repair and call reply times on a quarterly ground to the CWA, forth with information on the "locations of cable replacement, copper institute remediation, and remote terminal battery replacements." The CWA and Verizon will meet twice a twelvemonth to review the agreement, and the understanding is enforceable past the Pennsylvania Utility Committee, or PUC.

Information technology would be a vast oversimplification to imply that current Us infrastructure woes are solely the effect of corporate malfeasance and a willingness to dodge all responsibility for repair costs. The causes of such bug vary greatly, depending on local and land law, the infrastructure in question, and how that infrastructure and its associated maintenance costs have been managed or mismanaged over the last few decades.

Simply cases similar this one show how bad corporate actors can certainly contribute to the overall problem. Verizon's systemic infrastructure neglect, failure to see previously agreed-upon criteria for projects, and the willingness of state and local governments to permit big companies in general (and Verizon, specifically) walk away from these criteria with little to no punishment take certainly exacerbated the issue. Hopefully in Pennsylvania, at least, the rural communities that accept been shafted by these actions will see service improvements in the not-too-distant time to come.